You would think there would be some editorial oversight on a cover like this:
The red boxes were added by me. Obviously not meant to go together but still – a terrible image to go with the top headline.
Jill Kennedy – OnMedea
You would think there would be some editorial oversight on a cover like this:
The red boxes were added by me. Obviously not meant to go together but still – a terrible image to go with the top headline.
Jill Kennedy – OnMedea
Even when it’s good news!
Even when it’s a “liberal” pro-Hillary-slanting site – photo editors cannot resist putting up the “crazy Hillary Clinton” photos (e.g. CNN below).
She freakin’ clinched the nomination – THE FIRST WOMAN EVER IN A MAJOR PARTY – and CNN made her look crazy.
You can imagine just what Fox News did:
I mean, for Christ’s sake, this is New York Magazine’s pic:
And another NY Magazine:
All crazy. Nothing Presidential.
Mother Jones at least had the decency not to put up a picture at all.
I admit, a good, natural, happy picture of Hillary Clinton is very hard to find.
This is the best I could do:
But, damn, that was a long time ago. She hasn’t been happy in a long time.
Jill Kennedy – OnMedea