Media - General: December 2009 Archives
Deep-down, I believe almost everything Kagan puts out is bullshit. Entertainment industry projections that are almost never right.
However, I had to give pause when I saw this chart regarding Comcast's NBC Universal purchase. If you're an old media mogul, this chart should scare the living piss out of you (which for Sumner Redstone may be a healthy thing).
What Kagan is saying in this chart (and what I have believed for about a year now) is that Broadcast Networks are dead. JUST LOOK AT THOSE VALUATIONS! $1.7 Billion gets you NBC AND Telemundo. WTF? (That price would get you around 30% of USA Network.)
Seriously, there is no purpose for a broadcast network anymore. It's old media moguls trying to hold on to the old days. I hate to break to you guys... it's over. Martinis at The Smoke House and a show with a 40 share is fantastic... but it's over. Move on.
Steps should taken immediately to convert NBC to a basic cable channel (two revenue streams - come on, Jeff, mmmm - tasty). Do this and NBC would, overnight, become the most popular cable channel on TV (until CBS converts).
What this chart says that I completely don't believe (and DON'T WANT to believe) is that Intellectual Property is dead (film and television production and libraries). That's insane! Does Kagan seriously think we're heading for a future when content owners are no longer in charge?
If Disney, Warner Bros., Fox, Paramount, Universal and Sony lose the ability to further exploit, in any meaningful way, their owned, copyrighted, fully-amortized content that they've acquired and produced over the past several decades - these companies are basically worthless. A declining asset with no chance to recover.
Now, for the sake of my parent company, Manka Bros. Studios - The World's Largest Media Company (thus, the company with the most to lose), I hope Kagan is wrong (like they normally are). But, if Kagan is right, and we realize a future where studio libraries cost more to manage than they bring in and broadcast networks lose more and more market share to cable networks, who among us are going to survive?
Personally, I remain bullish on content and the future of intellectual property. HOLD ON TO THOSE COPYRIGHTS, MEDIA COMPANIES!
A cable channel (even with two revenue streams) is nothing but a pipe into the home. A convenience, yes. A necessity, no. The water, not the pipe, is what sustains life.
Jill Kennedy - OnMedea
However, I had to give pause when I saw this chart regarding Comcast's NBC Universal purchase. If you're an old media mogul, this chart should scare the living piss out of you (which for Sumner Redstone may be a healthy thing).
What Kagan is saying in this chart (and what I have believed for about a year now) is that Broadcast Networks are dead. JUST LOOK AT THOSE VALUATIONS! $1.7 Billion gets you NBC AND Telemundo. WTF? (That price would get you around 30% of USA Network.)
Seriously, there is no purpose for a broadcast network anymore. It's old media moguls trying to hold on to the old days. I hate to break to you guys... it's over. Martinis at The Smoke House and a show with a 40 share is fantastic... but it's over. Move on.
Steps should taken immediately to convert NBC to a basic cable channel (two revenue streams - come on, Jeff, mmmm - tasty). Do this and NBC would, overnight, become the most popular cable channel on TV (until CBS converts).
What this chart says that I completely don't believe (and DON'T WANT to believe) is that Intellectual Property is dead (film and television production and libraries). That's insane! Does Kagan seriously think we're heading for a future when content owners are no longer in charge?
If Disney, Warner Bros., Fox, Paramount, Universal and Sony lose the ability to further exploit, in any meaningful way, their owned, copyrighted, fully-amortized content that they've acquired and produced over the past several decades - these companies are basically worthless. A declining asset with no chance to recover.
Now, for the sake of my parent company, Manka Bros. Studios - The World's Largest Media Company (thus, the company with the most to lose), I hope Kagan is wrong (like they normally are). But, if Kagan is right, and we realize a future where studio libraries cost more to manage than they bring in and broadcast networks lose more and more market share to cable networks, who among us are going to survive?
Personally, I remain bullish on content and the future of intellectual property. HOLD ON TO THOSE COPYRIGHTS, MEDIA COMPANIES!
A cable channel (even with two revenue streams) is nothing but a pipe into the home. A convenience, yes. A necessity, no. The water, not the pipe, is what sustains life.
Jill Kennedy - OnMedea
About Jill Kennedy
Jill Kennedy is an Ivy League MBA / refugee from Lehman Brothers.
Manka Bros. (and the Manka Business Channel) hired her (for a very low sum) to cover the world of media (not the world of Medea) in her own words without corporate interference.
About Medea
Medea was a real bitch from classical mythology - as most famously dramatized by Euripides.
She was a sorceress and wife of Jason, whom she assisted in obtaining the Golden Fleece. When Jason deserted her, she chopped up their children. One could say, Medea acted as rationally as a major media company.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Infomercial Company on Say It Ain't So, Tony DiSanto: Hi Jill W
Hollywood Producer on CBS Films - R.I.P. - Beastly Update: I think Be
Jill Kennedy on The Trouble With Groupon: Thanks, Sa
sam on The Trouble With Groupon: Excellentl
santos loquasto on Not ANOTHER Fairy Tale Ending: See, the p
Jill Kennedy on The Trouble With Groupon: Hey BC Clo
Jammin Good on Advertise On Facebook - Reach More People Than 10 Super Bowls!: The worse,
BC Cloutier on The Trouble With Groupon: Oh, really
Joe on Advertise On Facebook - Reach More People Than 10 Super Bowls!: Fred, that
Archives
Search
[What is this?]
Categories
Tips, Scoops and Smoking Guns