Unattractive Women Have Zero Chance In Hollywood…

Ari Emanuel, Bob Iger, Diablo Cody, Disney, female screenwiters, Fox, Giada De Laurentiis, Jeff Robinov, Jeff Weiner, Jill Kennedy, Khan Manka, Lynn Shelton, Manka Bros., Paramount, script girl, Scriptgirl411, sexism in Hollywood, Tina Fey, top young screenwriters, unattractive women in hollywood, Universal, Warner Bros., Wendy Wasserstein… and New York, for that matter.  And I’m talking about WRITERS!

Of course, there are some small roles in film and television that are played by unattractive female actresses (the psychotic neighbor, the diner waitress, the homeless woman, the awkward teen friend, etc.) – and we sort of understand why ‘on-camera’ talent has to have a certain look.

But writers?  Why do they have to look a certain way?  They just have to be able to write.  Right?  Quasimodo should be able to make it in this town – that is, if Quasimodo was a really good writer.  Is that naive?

Being fairly new to L.A., I was shocked to learn that the new crop of budding female screenwriters (those under 30) are freakin’ hot.  And, of the females out there writing (and there are millions), the hot ones seem to be the only ones getting meetings.

There is a very high profile production company down the hall from my office which receives a good amount of foot traffic from writers pitching script ideas.  The males that come in are pretty much all unattractive, unkempt and fat (the standard male screenwriter uniform of baseball cap – [Cubs preferably], shorts and a giant t-shirt is a cliche… but in this case, a true cliche).  [Note:  If the male screenwriter becomes successful, then his body changes – he’s still unattractive but now he’s ‘kempt’ and very much in shape.  Success leads to getting laid, getting laid leads to getting in shape.]

The female writers that come in are all hot.  There’s not one Wendy Wasserstein in the bunch.  Some wear glasses to have that ‘smart’ look – but they all accentuate their boobs and have a nice tight ass.  Perhaps this current wave of new writers was influenced in some way by Scriptgirl411.  Even though ScriptGirl is mostly satire, there is a certain fantasy that male producers have (and have had since Hollywood began) and she hits it right on the head.

Ari Emanuel, Bob Iger, Diablo Cody, Disney, female screenwiters, Fox, Giada De Laurentiis, Jeff Robinov, Jeff Weiner, Jill Kennedy, Khan Manka, Lynn Shelton, Manka Bros., Paramount, script girl, Scriptgirl411, sexism in Hollywood, Tina Fey, top young screenwriters, unattractive women in hollywood, Universal, Warner Bros., Wendy WassersteinFemale screenwriters make up a extremely low percentage of screenplays written in this town (oh, let’s say 2%, though accurate data is very hard to come by) – so I suppose when male producers feel they need to hire a female to give the script a ‘certain voice’, being the shallow boys that they are, they would prefer to spend all that time with someone hot.  That’s pretty much the way this town works in every area of entertainment (even catering… thank you Giada De Laurentiis!).

I do believe this is just a fad and it will change once some of the beautiful but untalented writers start to get screen credits and the movies fail at the box office.  Talent will win the day – much as it did for older male screenwriters who were shut out in the 90s for younger guys right out of film school.

Today, it doesn’t seem to matter how old a male writer is, the quality of the script seems to win out.  This is mainly due to the low number of projects being greenlit and the low tolerance for bad writing.   Top male executives (and a couple of females) at production companies and studios can no longer take a chance on being the “cutting edge” type or “trend setting”.  In today’s economy, their jobs and bonuses are very much on the line – so they’d better get it right (write).

However, it’s funny, but when it’s a hot, young, female screenwriter, film executives have an amazing tolerance for bad writing.  This, too, will change.

Talent will win the day – though it’s much easier to get tits in the door than a foot.

Accel Partners, Ben Silverman, Bob Iger, Chris Hughes, David Kirkpatrick, Dustin Moskovitz, Eduardo Saverin, Gerald Levin, Greylock Partners, HBO, Jeff Bewkes, Jeff Zucker, Jill Kennedy, Joanna Shields, Jon Miller, Khan Manka, Li Ka-shing, Manka Bros., Mark Cuban, Mark Zuckerberg, Matt Cohler, MySpace, Nicolas Carlson, OnMedea, Owen Van Natta, Paul Buchheit, Peter Thiel, Rupert Murdoch, Sheryl Sandberg, Sumner Redstone, Toy Story 3Jill Kennedy – OnMedea

The Game of Images

Feeling like an iPhone-ographer is not merely a brand addiction. Apple does make a distinctly great phone, which has been met by the enthusiasm of many image-making or image-manipulation apps.

 

Rise of the Image

 

Culture people will talk about the dominance of pictures in modern societies, whereas many people’s grandparents had been living in an oral culture. TV and film has had a big influence, of course.

And now, in the Future, the high-tech world in which we live, we are in a visual culture that is different and new because we’re the makers. Also, our efforts with images somehow re-join oral culture, the culture of spoken words, because of the Internet.

 

Image + Internet

 

Let’s not overlook the obvious possible symbology (if what we said above isn’t off the mark) of having an excellent mobile camera mated with an excellent phone.

Even if we’re not jabbering with it, the phone actually allows our images to talk, by going out into social networks or online galleries like Flickr. On our own end, of course, the many apps we can use turn this slick hand-held device into a kind of mobile virtual darkroom.

Just like the written word has undergone an amazing change by getting lifted, in a way, on the breezes of the Web, social networks, sms’ing or even the captions on photos.

The fun of writing on one’s photos with a living graffiti has also emerged as very popular. So the same process of mobilization of the Word has happened to the Image.!

 

The Game of the Image

 

Since we now do not think of an image that we take as something static anymore (picture a Polaroid print), or chained to bulky equipment, an image becomes more like a moment that unlocks a whole stream of events.

Each photo we take as an iPhone-ographer is a living moment. As we do this for ourselves, some of our images strike a chord or look poignant somehow.

 Those images are the start of a kind of light-hearted game that can evolve around each of them. The game includes:

 

·       Posted online

·       Comments made on the photo

·       Captions

·       Photo graffiti

·       Tagging

·       Submissions

Let’s not forget that last one, because we are offered plenty of opportunities by today’s big media outlets (hungry for great crowd-sourced content) to submit our photo-studies. Sometimes there is a contest, or a prize or recognition in a respected scene.

So you see that all of this, in some combination with each photo, turns out to be a game we’re playing with the world around us — and our friends are also iPhone-ographers, or maybe even Android-ographers, too (bless their hearts).

And, funnily enough, that same camera-phone can also take us into a world of moving images, if you ever fancy a little excitement, post-iPhoneography. Have you seen the newest animated gag slot machines like South Park? Check out http://www.classycasinos.co.uk for the most reliable places to have a little unexpected fun.